| . | WHAT'S NEW | RESEARCH & TOPICS | WORKPLACE| MEDICAL | ABOUT US | RESOURCES | PRIVACY POLICY |
![]() |
![]() |
|
PRESS
CONTACT
WHAT'S NEW
SITE NAV OPTIONS
TWITTER: @PRIVACY FORUM
|
New Report and Consumer PrinciplesThe One-Way-Mirror Society: Privacy Implications of the New Digital Signage Networks
New forms of sophisticated digital signage networks are being deployed widely by retailers and others in both public and private spaces. From simple people-counting sensors mounted on doorways to sophisticated facial recognition cameras mounted in flat video screens and end-cap displays, digital signage technologies are gathering increasing amounts of detailed information about consumers, their behaviors, and their characteristics, like age, gender, and ethnicity.
The privacy problems inherent in digital networks are profound, and to date these issues have not been adequately addressed by anyone. This report by the World Privacy Forum seeks to shed light in a dark area and to start a more robust public debate. In addition to the report, the WPF has released with a group of the nation's leading consumer groups a set of privacy principles to be used in digital signage networks. Download the reportDownload the Digital Signage Privacy Principles
8/02/2010 Financial privacy, SECWPF files comments on deeply flawed SEC planThe World Privacy Forum filed comments today criticizing the SEC proposed regulations that would release an unprecedented amount of financial details about individual borrowers through the EDGAR database. The WPF was joined by other privacy, consumer, and human rights organizations in its comments, which focused on the privacy issues with the proposed regulations. Pam Dixon, executive director of the WPF, stated in the comments that the SEC's new regulations would "Place on the public record and online the largest amount of personal financial information about borrowers ever disclosed, including information never before made public." The comments also note that the SEC's plan greatly increases the risk of identity theft for individual borrowers whose information will be released publicly.
5/18/2010 Medical privacyWPF comments on possible changes to HIPAA privacy rule; requests more patient access to audit logsThe World Privacy Forum filed comments with the US Department of Health and Human Services today in response to its Request for Information about possible changes to the HIPAA health privacy rule. WPF strongly supported patients' current right to request a history of disclosures of their medical files, and requested an expansion of this right. WPF noted in its comments to HHS that "An individual cannot fully protect his/her privacy interest in a health record (and most other records) unless he/she has a right of access to the record, the right to propose a correction, and the right to see who has used the record and to whom it has been disclosed. Each of these elements is essential." Read the full WPF comments | Related: Patient's Guide to HIPAA
2/25/2010 New privacy principlesNation's leading privacy and consumer groups release privacy principles for digital signageThe nation's leading consumer and privacy groups released a set of baseline consumer privacy principles to be included in digital signage networks. The principles were released at the Digital Signage Expo in Las Vegas, Nevada, where World Privacy Forum executive director Pam Dixon spoke about the principles to a large group of digital signage industry professionals. Download the DS principles document with signatories
1/27/2010 FTC Privacy RoundtableWorld Privacy Forum to speak at FTC Privacy RoundtableThursday, January 28, WPF Executive Director Pam Dixon will be speaking at the FTC's Privacy Roundtable about the privacy implications of digital signage networks and will be specifically discussing the new report: The One-Way Mirror Society: Privacy Implications of the New Digital Signage Networks. Few consumers, legislators, regulators, or policy makers are aware of the capabilities of digital signs or of the extent of their use. The technology presents new problems and highlights old conflicts about privacy, public spaces, and the need for a meaningful debate. More about the FTC event | Read the Report
1/04/2010 Genetic discriminationWorld Privacy Forum files comments with Department of Labor regarding genetic regulationsThe World Privacy Forum filed comments today with the Department of Labor requesting that the DOL expand its protections of how genetic information may be used by health insurance companies or group health plans. The World Privacy Forum urged the DOL to include genetic information posted on social networking sites in its consideration of the GINA regulations. See the WPF comments to the DOL | More on genetic privacy at the WPF
12/07/2009 FTC Privacy RoundtableFTC Privacy Roundtable: WPF to testify on information brokersWPF executive director Pam Dixon will testify at the FTC Privacy Roundtable about information brokers and commercial data practices and they impact consumers. Dixon will be discussing the business models of data brokers, issues with smart grids, and opt-out problems, among other issues. See the WPF written comments to the FTC | Related: WPF FTC petition re: data broker opt-outs | Related: Smart Grids and Privacy
12/04/2009 Genetic non-discrimination regulations (GINA)World Privacy Forum comments on genetic non-discrimination to HHSThe World Privacy Forum filed comments on proposed regulations for implementing Title I of GINA, the Genetic Non-Discrimination Act. The WPF requested a change to the proposed regulations, asking the Department of Health and Human Services require immediate posting of revised notices of privacy practices on the web sites of affected health plans. Under the proposed regulations, written notice of revised privacy practices to individuals could be delayed due to the cost of postal mailing. The WPF noted that a revised privacy notice posted on a health plan's web site would not incur postal costs, and that regulated entities should take this minimum step to inform consumers of any changes regarding privacy practices affecting genetic non-discrimination. See the WPF comments on Title I of GINA | Related: WPF Genetic privacy page
11/19/2009 Congressional testimonyWorld Privacy Forum testifies before the House Energy and Commerce CommitteeWPF executive director Pam Dixon testified at a joint subcommittee hearing focused on privacy and the collection and use of online and offline consumer information. Dixon's testimony focused on the new "modern permanent record" and how it is used and created. Dixon said "The merging of offline and online data is creating highly personalized, granular profiles of consumers that affect consumers’ opportunities in the marketplace and in their lives. Consumers are largely unaware of these profiles and their consequences, and they have insufficient legal rights to change things even if they did know." The testimony explored concrete examples of problematic consumer profiling activities.
11/11/2009 FTC "Exploring Privacy" Roundtable SeriesWPF to speak at FTC Exploring Privacy RoundtableThe World Privacy Forum has been invited to speak at the Federal Trade Commission's first Privacy Roundtable, to be held December 7, 2009 in Washington DC. More on the FTC Exploring Privacy Roundtables | See the WPF comments to the FTC for the Roundtable (First filing).
11/06/2009 FTC Privacy RoundtableWPF files comments for FTC Roundtables on privacy standards, consumer expectations of privacyThe World Privacy Forum filed comments last week for the FTC Privacy Roundtables, the first of which will be held December 7, 2009. The WPF comments urged the FTC to consider the Fair Credit Reporting Act as a key privacy model to apply to additional areas, to use the full version of Fair Information Practices, and discussed how a rights-based framework was the key to advancing consumers' interests. The comments discussed list brokers at length, and explained how even the most informationally cautious consumer will land on numerous marketing lists and databases. The WPF comments noted that not all marketing lists are used to target ads to consumers; some lists and databases are used to deny consumers goods and services. The comments contain a detailed section on privacy frameworks, a section on direct marketing, and an appendix with supporting information. See WPF's FTC comments | Related: WPF Intro to Fair Information Practices page
11/03/2009 Madrid DeclarationMadrid Declaration published; global privacy standards for a global world; WPF is signatoryA significant civil society document with more than 100 signatories worldwide has been published in conjunction with the 31st annual meeting of the International Conference of Privacy and Data Protection Commissioners. The document, known as the Madrid Declaration, affirms support for the complete canon of fair information practices as expressed by the OECD, affirms support of privacy as a fundamental human right, and warns that "the failure to safeguard privacy jeopardizes associated freedoms, including freedom of expression, freedom of assembly, freedom of access to information, non-discrimination, and ultimately the stability of constitutional democracies." See the Madrid Declaration | Related: WPF Intro to Fair Information Practices page
11/02/2009 Red Flag RuleRed Flag Rule enforcement delayed until 2010The Federal Trade Commission has delayed the enforcement date of the Red Flag Rule until June 1, 2010. FTC announcement of Red Flag delay
10/26/2009 Data Breach | HHS HITECH Breach NotificationMedical data breach rule needs more work; World Privacy Forum files comments with HHS requesting changesThe World Privacy Forum filed comments on the HHS data breach rulemaking and asked for substantive changes in several areas. In particular, WPF asked HHS to expressly state a requirement for a breach risk assessment in the final rule itself, and to set a requirement that the risk assessment must be conducted by an independent organization. The WPF also asked that HHS set breach risk assessment standards so that there is some uniformity and guidance as to what constitutes an appropriately rigorous risk assessment when a breach occurs. In the comments, WPF also discussed the relationship between medical identity theft and medical data breach and how this impacts patients and consumers. Read the WPF comments on HITECH Breach Notification | Related: Medical ID theft page
10/22/2009 Security freeze | Financial privacy | identity theftWPF Credit Freeze information page updatedThe World Privacy Forum has updated its credit freeze (security freeze) page to reflect changes in some state-level laws. See the updated security freeze page
09/28/2009 Red Flag | Identity theftWPF updates Red Flag reportThe World Privacy Forum has updated its Red Flag report, Red Flag and Address Discrepancy Requirements: Suggestions for Health Care Providers. The update reflects the new effective date of the Red Flag Rule, (November 1, 2009) and incorporates other minor updates in the text. This report replaces the original Red Flag report published September 2008. Read the updated Red Flag report | Related: Medical ID Theft Page
08/24/2009 Financial privacy | Privacy ActWPF asks Treasury to get consumers' consent before checking their credit reportsThe World Privacy Forum filed comments today urging the U.S. Treasury Department to obtain consumers' consent before checking their credit reports. Consumers who participate in the government's Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) -- an Obama administration program created to help consumers renegotiate their mortgages so they can keep their homes -- must allow the Federal Government to check their credit reports without first obtaining consent. This procedure sets a negative precedent, and is at odds with consumer expectations of privacy. The Treasury gave itself this power in an obscure set of "Routine Uses" in a Privacy Act notice published along with the proposed system of records for the program. The World Privacy Forum has objected to this, and has filed detailed comments with the Treasury about the lack of consumer consent. The public comment period on this program is open until September 4, 2009. Read the WPF comments to the Treasury | Read the Treasury System of Records Notice | See other WPF Agency comments at our Agency Comment Page
08/19/2009 Health ITHealth IT standards meetingThe Health IT Standards Committee will be meeting tomorrow, August 20, from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. in Washington DC. Those interested in this meeting can participate in person, or via the phone and web. The privacy and security workgroup will report at 1:30 pm Eastern. Location and call-in information is available at the HHS web site. Get more information and details about the meeting (HHS) | WPF Medical Privacy page
08/17/2009 Data breach rulesFTC issues final rule on health data breachesThe Federal Trade Commission has issued its final Health Breach Notification Rule for vendors of Personal Health Records and related entities, as required under ARRA, The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. The initial proposed Health Breach Notification Rule was generally thoughtful and thorough. The World Privacy Forum submitted extensive comments on the proposed rule both supporting parts of it and making some suggestions for changes. The FTC incorporated several specific WPF suggestions into the final rule. In particular, the FTC incorporated the applicability of the rule to foreign entities with U.S. customers (Final Rule p. 17), and the applicability of the rule to search engines appearing on Personal Health Record web sites (Final Rule p. 34). The new rule will be published in the Federal Register shortly; until then, it is available at the FTC web site. Also available is a form that entities covered under this rule can use to report data breaches to the FTC. The Health Breach Notification Rule will be effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register, and full compliance with the rule will be required beginning 180 days after publication. See the FTC's final Health Breach Notification Rule (PDF)| See the FTC data breach notice form (PDF) | Related: WPF Personal Health Record page
08/10/2009 Web trackingWorld Privacy Forum files comments on government use of web tracking technologiesThe World Privacy Forum filed comments with the Office of Management and Budget regarding its proposal to begin to allow the use of tracking cookies on government web sites. The proposal was published in the Federal Register, and outlined a three-tiered plan for how web tracking technologies might be used. The Forum's comments focused on methods of opt-out, data retention, secondary use, user authentication, new tracking technologies such as Flash cookies, and the need for new opt-out mechanisms. The Forum also urged the federal government to not allow third party tracking of consumers' use of government web sites, and to guard against any discrimination against consumers who do not want to be tracked. WPF comments about web tracking on government sites | Federal Register notice about the program | Related: WPF Internet privacy landing page
07/17/2009 Cloud computingWorld Privacy Forum sends letter to Los Angeles Mayor regarding proposed cloud computing contractThe World Privacy Forum sent a letter to Los Angeles Mayor Villaraigosa today expressing concerns and questions about a proposed contract to move the city of Los Angeles' email and some other computing tasks to a cloud-based system. The Forum expressed concerns in particular about the lack of contractual protection for health data, AIDs data, genetic information, domestic violence and sexual assault victim information, among other sensitive information. The Forum suggested the city undertake an independent and thorough risk assessment prior to completing the contract, and suggested a robust public comment process that includes all stakeholders. The City will take up the issue of this contract at a city council Information Technology Committee meeting on Tuesday July 21. The World Privacy Forum published a detailed analysis of the privacy issues of cloud computing in February which outlines the challenges and ambiguities that governments and others face as they make decisions about what data to put in the cloud. WPF letter to Mayor Villaraigosa | WPF Cloud Computing Page | WPF report: Privacy in the Clouds
07/14/2009 Social networksFacebook, MySpace, Xing receive warning letters from EU consumer groupIn the wake of Europe's Article 29 Working Party Opinion on Social Network Providers adopted in June, the Federation of German Consumer Organizations (VZBV) has sent out warning letters to five social networking providers in Germany, including Facebook and MySpace. The letters focus on the excessive rights the companies allow themselves in their respective Terms of Use agreements, and on shortcomings in the privacy policies. VZBV is comprised of 41 German consumer associations. VZBV press release (in German) | Related: Article 29 Working Party Opinion on Social Network Providers
07/13/2009 Behavioral advertisingIAB releases flawed guidelines for controlling behavioral advertising practicesThe Interactive Advertising Bureau has released its self-regulatory guidelines for online advertisers. The guidelines are inadequate to protect consumers, and in some cases, create loopholes for significant consumer harm. In the area of sensitive information, the guidelines are especially weak. The IAB definition of sensitive information is much weaker than the definition of sensitive information already adopted by industry in the formal NAI agreement, which is still in effect today. Additionally, the new IAB guidelines rely on weak accountability standards; a World Privacy Forum report analyzed the NAI accountabilty and reporting, and found that the Network Advertising Initiative (NAI) accountability mechanisms had failed. The IAB accountability mechanisms do not improve on the NAI accountability mechanisms, and as such, are problematic at best. IAB industry guidelines | Privacy groups' proposal on behavioral advertising | WPF report on the failure of online advertising self-regulation
06/19/2009 Social NetworkingEU: Article 29 Working Party releases Opinion on social networking sitesThe Article 29 Working Party has adopted an important Opinion regarding social networking sites as of June 12. The opinion covers privacy, advertising, sensitive information, and other issues relating to online social networking. Regarding sensitive data, the Article 29 Working Party stated: "Data revealing racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, trade-union membership or data concerning health or sex life is considered sensitive. Sensitive personal data may only be published on the Internet with the explicit consent from the data subject or if the data subject has made the data manifestly public himself." Regarding use of sensitive data to target advertising, the Article 29 opinion stated: "The Working Party recommends not using sensitive data in behavioral advertising models, unless all legal requirements are met." The opinion also stated that the EU Data Protection Directive generally applies to the processing of personal data by social networking services, even when their headquarters are outside of the EEA, and that social networking service providers are considered data controllers under the Data Protection Directive. Article 29 WP Opinion on Social Networking sites and press release | TACD press release on opinion | TACD May 2009 Resolution on Social Networks
06/10/2009 TACDWorld Privacy Forum at TACD meetingThe World Privacy Forum participated in the Trans Atlantic Consumer Dialogue meetings in Brussels this June, and is pleased to announce that WPF is now a full member of the TACD. The TACD is a network of 80 EU and U.S. consumer organizations that develop joint consumer policy recommendations for the EU and U.S. in an effort to promote the consumer interest in transatlantic policymaking.
06/01/2009 Data Breach of Health Records - FTCWorld Privacy Forum files comments with the FTC regarding proposed rules for health care-related data breachesThe World Privacy Forum filed extensive comments with the Federal Trade Commission today regarding its notice of proposed rulemaking for data breaches of information containing actual health care information or health care-related information. The FTC rulemaking will apply to a variety of record holders, especially vendors of personal health records. The Forum supported much of the FTC's proposed rulemaking, finding the rulemaking generally thoughtful and careful. In some areas, the Forum urged the FTC to narrow and further define and strengthen the proposed rule. The World Privacy Forum urged the FTC to tighten language around scope, the definition of "personal health record," law enforcement delays of consumer notification, and urged the FTC to further clarify the definition of what falls under the category of "de-identified data." Citing the research of Dr. LaTanya Sweeney and others, the Forum urged the FTC to require commercial companies and others holding health care data that has been partially de-identified to still report those breaches to the FTC and the public, and to monitor for re-identification. Read the comments | Related: Medical privacy page | PHR Page | Medical ID Theft page
05/21/2009 Health Record Data Breaches - HHSWorld Privacy Forum files comments with HHS regarding data breach guidanceThe World Privacy Forum filed comments with the Department of Health and Human Services today regarding the HITECH Act guidance that HHS published along with a request for comments. The Forum urged the Department to tighten its proposed guidance, and to add more protections, oversight, and rules for "limited data set" breaches. Read the comments | Related: Patient's Guide to HIPAA | Medical Privacy Page | NHIN Page
05/08/2009 Job Search PrivacyJob Searcher's Guide to Job Search SitesThe World Privacy Forum's popular and long-standing Job Searcher's Guide has been completely updated. We have a site-by-site comparison of the privacy practices of online job search sites. This guide was originally posted in 2003, and has been updated regularly. This was a major update of this resource. The World Privacy Forum publishes extensive job search privacy resources in addition to the Guide, including a very popular guide to resume posting privacy. Visit the Job Searcher's Guide | Related: Visit the job search privacy page or visit the resume posting privacy tips
05/07/2009 Credit FreezeCredit Freeze Guide How-To Guide updatedWe have updated the World Privacy Forum's state-by-state guide on how to place a credit, or security, freeze. Only a few states are lacking a security or credit freeze law now.
05/01/2009 Genetic Privacy | GINAWorld Privacy Forum files comments on proposed genetic discrimination regulationsThe World Privacy Forum filed comments on the proposed regulations on the Genetic Information NonDiscrimination Act, or GINA. The comments request that the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission close down several potential loopholes in consumer protection in the proposed regulations. The Forum specifically asked the EEOC to consider curtailing the amount of commercially available information employers could access about employees, for example, through marketing databases. WPF also requested that those covered under GINA be required to maintain audit trails in certain circumstances, and urged that wellness programs be structured in such a way so as to prevent information leakage through billing and other activities. Read the comments | Related: WPF Genetic Privacy Page
04/16/2009 Online privacy | FTCWhen opting out is hard to do: World Privacy Forum sends letter to FTC about companies offering mail-based opt outsThe World Privacy Forum sent a letter to the Federal Trade Commission asking it to look into four companies offering online consumers the ability to opt out, then asking those consumers to use a variety of postal-mail-based methods to do so. Read the letter to the FTC | Related: WPF Top Ten Opt Out page
03/27/2009 CVS Caremark | FTC proposed consent agreementWorld Privacy Forum asks FTC to reconsider proposed consent agreement with CVSThe World Privacy Forum filed comments with the Federal Trade Commission in response to its proposed consent agreement with the CVS Caremark pharmacy chain. The proposed agreement is in response to a CVS data breach. The agreement does not impose a monetary penalty on CVS, and does not provide remedies for consumers affected by the data breach. Read the WPF comments | Related: FTC consent agreement with CVS
03/27/2009 CHILI - California Health Information Identification data baseCalifornia CHILI database now onlineA substantial new resource for individuals seeking to research California laws and regulations regarding health information has come online. The CHILI database is a project of the California Office of Health Information Integrity, and has interfaced with the California Privacy and Security Advisory Board, which the World Privacy Forum co-chairs. The CHILI database can be searched by HIPAA section, California Code section, California health information law keywords, or by statutory scheme. See the CHILI database home page
02/23/2009 New ReportPrivacy in the CloudsThe World Privacy Forum's newest report examines the privacy and confidentiality issues of cloud computing that have been largely overlooked to date. It is a thorough analysis with policy findings. Privacy in the Clouds: Risks to Privacy and Confidentiality from Cloud Computing was written by Robert Gellman for the World Privacy Forum. Cloud computing tips for consumers and business are also available. Go directly to the report (PDF) | See the report and the consumer tips on the World Privacy Forum Cloud Privacy Page | Read the press release
02/18/2009 Medical privacy | HIPAA | FTCCVS Caremark pharmacy chain agrees to pay $2.25 million to settle charges of HIPAA violations; also settles with the FTCAccording to a legal complaint, CVS pharmacies -- the largest pharmacy chain in the United States -- did not take appropriate steps to protect its customers' and employees' sensitive information when it improperly disposed of documents, labels, prescription bottles, and other items with clearly identifiable and highly sensitive personal information such as SSNs, prescription information, driver's license numbers, and other information still on those materials. CVS agreed to pay $2.25 million to settle its violations of HIPAA as part of a Resolution Agreement with the Department of Health and Human Services. CVS has also signed a consent agreement with the FTC; the public can comment on this agreement until March 20, 2009. The World Privacy Forum will be filing comments with the FTC on the consent agreement with CVS, which we will post here. Read the FTC complaint against CVS | Read the FTC consent agreement with CVS | Read the HHS Resolution Agreement with CVS
02/12/2009 Internet privacyFTC releases its online advertising principles; Commissioner Harbour urges FTC to go beyond self-regulationThe Federal Trade Commission released its self-regulatory principles for behaviorally-targeted advertising today. The World Privacy Forum will be holding a press conference responding to the principles at 12:30 p.m. Eastern. Read the text of the FTC statements | See the WPF Behavioral Advertising Page for our resources and documents on behavioral advertising
2/05/2009 BiometricsWorld Privacy Forum opposes California DMV planThe California DMV (Division of Motor Vehicles) has proposed, through an expedited 30- day process, that it begin taking detailed facial scans of drivers and storing the scans in a state-wide database. This change, among other proposed DMV changes, represents a substantial policy shift for the state of California. The World Privacy Forum has urged that this process goes through normal legislative procedures so that there is adequate time for public input and for formal hearings.
01/28/2009 International Privacy DayWorld Privacy Forum celebrates International Privacy DayThe World Privacy Forum celebrated International Privacy Day by joining other privacy and civil liberties organizations in encouraging the U.S. Senate to adopt the Council of Europe Privacy Convention. The U.S. has already ratified the Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime. International Privacy Day was founded three years ago by the Council of Europe, and is celebrated by privacy, civil liberties, and consumer groups in Europe, North America and elsewhere. See the proposed U.S. Senate resolution | Read more about the Council of Europe Privacy Convention | Related: WPF's Fair Information Practices page
01/27/2009 Monster.com | Consumer Alert | Job search privacyConsumer Alert: Monster.com announces another big data breachAccording to the job site Monster.com, its users' IDs and passwords, email addresses, names, phone numbers, and some "basic demographic data" were compromised in a data breach. Monster notified victims of the security breach through its web site on Friday, January 23, 2009. It is unclear how many people this notice impacts, as Monster.com did not give an estimate. In press reports, however, Monster has admitted that the breach is global, with Asia Pacific and Eastern Europe being spared. Job seekers' information can be used like a road map for criminal ventures, including identity theft, phishing and spamming. User passwords, which Monster.com says were compromised in this breach, are especially valuable as they can potentially be used to access other sites or email accounts, especially if a person regularly uses the same passwords. The World Privacy Forum has published a consumer alert about this data breach with tips for victims. This data breach also impacts USAjobs.com, the government job search site affiliated wiith Monster.com. See the new Consumer Alert with safety tips | See more job search privacy resources
01/05/2009 School privacy | FERPANew privacy rules for schools released; World Privacy Forum comments had positive impact for student and parent privacyIn May 2008 the World Privacy Forum submitted detailed comments on proposed changes to the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act regulations (FERPA). The FERPA regulations are the rules that control how schools treat and release student information. The final FERPA regulations have now been published and reveal that the World Privacy Forum comments had a positive impact. The new regulations agreed with WPF's comment that if a school requests a Federal tax return from a parent, that the parent has the right to redact all financial information from the form, and affirmed that the school does not have a requirement to ask for the tax form in the first place. The regulations also agreed with the WPF comment that the risk of re-identification of published student information is cumulative, and made recommendations that educational institutions take into account all releases of student information it has made, not just new releases. Read the new FERPA regulations (PDF) | See the World Privacy Forum FERPA comments
Search by date, type of material, or keywordWPF Site Navigation Options
|
|
| © 2003 - 2009 WORLD PRIVACY FORUM | CONTACT | RESOURCES | PRIVACY POLICY |