WPF a panelist at FTC Data Portability Workshop

WPF’s Pam Dixon will be a panelist at the FTC Data Portability Workshop, to take place Tuesday, Sept. 22, 8:30 am – 3 pm Eastern Time. The workshop will examine the potential benefits and challenges to consumers, privacy, and competition raised by data portability, which is the ability of consumers to move data from one service to another or to themselves. The specific panel Dixon will be speaking on is at 12 noon ET regarding reconciling the risks and benefits of data portability.

The workshop will be livecast online. A link to view the workshop will be posted the morning of the event to the event page and ftc.gov. The link will go live about an hour before the event.

The event will also be tweeted live from the FTC’s Twitter page (@FTC) using the hashtag #DataToGoFTC.

The agenda for the panel is located here.

Posted September 21, 2020 in

Global Visualization of Countries with Data Privacy Laws, Treaties, or Conventions

Background and Methodology: The conceptualization and initial research for this...
New Report: Risky Analysis: Assessing and Improving AI Governance Tools

We are pleased to announce the publication of a new WPF report, “Risky Analysis: Assessing and Improving AI Governance Tools.” This report sets out a definition of AI governance tools, documents why and how these tools are critically important for trustworthy AI, and where these tools are around the world. The report also documents problems in some AI governance tools themselves, and suggests pathways to improve AI governance tools and create an evaluative environment to measure their effectiveness. AI systems should not be deployed without simultaneously evaluating the potential adverse impacts of such systems and mitigating their risks, and most of the world agrees about the need to take precautions against the threats posed. The specific tools and techniques that exist to evaluate and measure AI systems for their inclusiveness, fairness, explainability, privacy, safety and other trustworthiness issues — called in the report collectively AI governance tools – can improve such issues. While some AI governance tools provide reassurance to the public and to regulators, the tools too often lack meaningful oversight and quality assessments. Incomplete or ineffective AI governance tools can create a false sense of confidence, cause unintended problems, and generally undermine the promise of AI systems. The report contains rich background details, use cases, potential solutions to the problems discussed in the report, and a global index of AI Governance Tools.
National IDs Around the World — Interactive map

About this Data Visualization: This interactive map displays the presence...