Privacy and Access 20/20, Conference of Privacy Commissioner for British Columbia, WPF speaking on Big Data

Pam Dixon will be speaking at the The Information and Privacy Commissioner for British Columbia’s conference in Vancouver, Canada on Thursday, Nov. 12 at 3:45 pm. Dixon will be speaking about big data and privacy in a debate format with Deputy Minister of Technology John Jacobson moderating. Dixon’s slide deck for the debate will be made available to conference attendees.

From the conference brochure:

The Big Data Debate – 3:45 pm

Big data has the potential to reveal insights into consumer behavior, improve health outcomes, and our quality of life. There is no question big data, coupled with advanced analytics, can generate value for businesses, consumers and society. But the use of big data also presents big challenges for privacy, including accountability for how the insights gained are ultimately used. This panel is framed as a debate: are privacy laws up to the challenge of big data, yes or no?

For conference venue and registration details, see the conference page.

Related materials: The Scoring of America

Posted November 11, 2015 in

Global Visualization of Countries with Data Privacy Laws, Treaties, or Conventions

Background and Methodology: The conceptualization and initial research for this...
New Report: Risky Analysis: Assessing and Improving AI Governance Tools

We are pleased to announce the publication of a new WPF report, “Risky Analysis: Assessing and Improving AI Governance Tools.” This report sets out a definition of AI governance tools, documents why and how these tools are critically important for trustworthy AI, and where these tools are around the world. The report also documents problems in some AI governance tools themselves, and suggests pathways to improve AI governance tools and create an evaluative environment to measure their effectiveness. AI systems should not be deployed without simultaneously evaluating the potential adverse impacts of such systems and mitigating their risks, and most of the world agrees about the need to take precautions against the threats posed. The specific tools and techniques that exist to evaluate and measure AI systems for their inclusiveness, fairness, explainability, privacy, safety and other trustworthiness issues — called in the report collectively AI governance tools – can improve such issues. While some AI governance tools provide reassurance to the public and to regulators, the tools too often lack meaningful oversight and quality assessments. Incomplete or ineffective AI governance tools can create a false sense of confidence, cause unintended problems, and generally undermine the promise of AI systems. The report contains rich background details, use cases, potential solutions to the problems discussed in the report, and a global index of AI Governance Tools.
National IDs Around the World — Interactive map

About this Data Visualization: This interactive map displays the presence...