Deputy Director Kate Kaye to Participate in Rutgers Roundtable on Synthetic Media Policy

WPF Deputy Director Kate Kaye is among a select group of invited researchers and other experts who will be participating in a roundtable discussion held by Rutgers Institute for Information Policy and Law and Tech Policy Press. At the Roundtable on Synthetic Media Policy: Where Next? Kate will share her ongoing research regarding data use and data privacy impacts of emerging content provenance standards and systems used in digital and AI governance.

Attendees will take part in discussions addressing synthetic content harms across the technology stack; the interplay of policy, tech and markets; efficacy, metrics and parameters of synthetic media related interventions; and more.

The roundtable will be held Friday, December 13, 2024 in Washington, DC.

Who: Kate Kaye, Deputy Director

What: Roundtable on Synthetic Media Policy: Where Next?

Where: CSET, 500 1st St NW, Washington, DC

When: December 13, 2024

Posted December 13, 2024 in

Global Table of Countries with Data Privacy Laws, Treaties, or Conventions

To see the research and use this data visualization: Each...
New Report: Risky Analysis: Assessing and Improving AI Governance Tools

We are pleased to announce the publication of a new WPF report, “Risky Analysis: Assessing and Improving AI Governance Tools.” This report sets out a definition of AI governance tools, documents why and how these tools are critically important for trustworthy AI, and where these tools are around the world. The report also documents problems in some AI governance tools themselves, and suggests pathways to improve AI governance tools and create an evaluative environment to measure their effectiveness. AI systems should not be deployed without simultaneously evaluating the potential adverse impacts of such systems and mitigating their risks, and most of the world agrees about the need to take precautions against the threats posed. The specific tools and techniques that exist to evaluate and measure AI systems for their inclusiveness, fairness, explainability, privacy, safety and other trustworthiness issues — called in the report collectively AI governance tools – can improve such issues. While some AI governance tools provide reassurance to the public and to regulators, the tools too often lack meaningful oversight and quality assessments. Incomplete or ineffective AI governance tools can create a false sense of confidence, cause unintended problems, and generally undermine the promise of AI systems. The report contains rich background details, use cases, potential solutions to the problems discussed in the report, and a global index of AI Governance Tools.
National IDs Around the World — Interactive map

About this Data Visualization: This interactive map displays the presence...