WPF advises FTC regarding proposed changes to the Telemarketing Sales Rule

The World Privacy Forum provided comments to the FTC regarding its proposed substantive amendments to the Telemarketing Sales Rule (part 310), 87 FR 33677.

Generally, WPF supports nearly all of the proposed changes in the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. However, we are concerned about three specific areas:

The expansion of consumer records kept by telemarketers without commensurate requirements for not selling, sharing, or otherwise using those records
The narrowness of some of the technical language around soundboard technology in the proposal. We encourage the addition of broader terms such as digital soundboards.
The proposal does not incorporate the modern uses of voice biometrics in its analysis of telemarketing activities. This is an extremely important analysis to add to the rule. The proposal could be as simple as requiring telemarketing companies to notify consumers of the use of such technologies, and to keep records of what technologies were used, why, and when.

We have urged the Commission to do more in these areas, which we discuss in these comments.

Related Documents:

Posted August 3, 2022 in Federal Trade Commission (FTC), Public Comments
Tags: Telemarketing Sales Rule NPRM

Global Visualization of Countries with Data Privacy Laws, Treaties, or Conventions

Background and Methodology: The conceptualization and initial research for this...
New Report: Risky Analysis: Assessing and Improving AI Governance Tools

We are pleased to announce the publication of a new WPF report, “Risky Analysis: Assessing and Improving AI Governance Tools.” This report sets out a definition of AI governance tools, documents why and how these tools are critically important for trustworthy AI, and where these tools are around the world. The report also documents problems in some AI governance tools themselves, and suggests pathways to improve AI governance tools and create an evaluative environment to measure their effectiveness. AI systems should not be deployed without simultaneously evaluating the potential adverse impacts of such systems and mitigating their risks, and most of the world agrees about the need to take precautions against the threats posed. The specific tools and techniques that exist to evaluate and measure AI systems for their inclusiveness, fairness, explainability, privacy, safety and other trustworthiness issues — called in the report collectively AI governance tools – can improve such issues. While some AI governance tools provide reassurance to the public and to regulators, the tools too often lack meaningful oversight and quality assessments. Incomplete or ineffective AI governance tools can create a false sense of confidence, cause unintended problems, and generally undermine the promise of AI systems. The report contains rich background details, use cases, potential solutions to the problems discussed in the report, and a global index of AI Governance Tools.
National IDs Around the World — Interactive map

About this Data Visualization: This interactive map displays the presence...