The emergence of Mobile Digital ID in the US context: presentation

WPF Executive Director Pam Dixon will be presenting an overview and discussion of the state of the US digital identity ecosystem at the Federal Identity Forum this week, and how privacy regulations and standards operate within the evolving landscape, including a discussion of the emerging mobile ID landscape in the US. This will be the first of many presentations Dixon will be making on the mID standard in the US (mobile ID), and what the status of its implementation is, including how privacy laws and practices interact with mID in the US context.

Dixon will be joining panel participants:

Elizabeth Kelly, Special Assistant to the President, National Economic Counsel, the White House
Connie LaSalle, Senior Technology Advisor, NIST
Jay Sinha, Senior Counsel DOJ Office of Privacy and Civil Liberties
Francois Bedard, Franco Canadian Ambassador, DIACC
Arun Vemury, DHS
Kay Turner, Chief Digital Identity Advisor of FinCEN (Treasury) organized the panel and will be moderating.

WPF Deputy Director Kate Kaye will also be attending the Forum.

Event information:

Quo Vadis Digital Identity?

Wednesday, 6 September, 1- 2 pm.

Federal Identity Forum, 6-7 September, 2023

Program Information

Posted September 6, 2023 in Digitial Identity, Events and Conferences, Governance

Global Visualization of Countries with Data Privacy Laws, Treaties, or Conventions

Background and Methodology: The conceptualization and initial research for this...
New Report: Risky Analysis: Assessing and Improving AI Governance Tools

We are pleased to announce the publication of a new WPF report, “Risky Analysis: Assessing and Improving AI Governance Tools.” This report sets out a definition of AI governance tools, documents why and how these tools are critically important for trustworthy AI, and where these tools are around the world. The report also documents problems in some AI governance tools themselves, and suggests pathways to improve AI governance tools and create an evaluative environment to measure their effectiveness. AI systems should not be deployed without simultaneously evaluating the potential adverse impacts of such systems and mitigating their risks, and most of the world agrees about the need to take precautions against the threats posed. The specific tools and techniques that exist to evaluate and measure AI systems for their inclusiveness, fairness, explainability, privacy, safety and other trustworthiness issues — called in the report collectively AI governance tools – can improve such issues. While some AI governance tools provide reassurance to the public and to regulators, the tools too often lack meaningful oversight and quality assessments. Incomplete or ineffective AI governance tools can create a false sense of confidence, cause unintended problems, and generally undermine the promise of AI systems. The report contains rich background details, use cases, potential solutions to the problems discussed in the report, and a global index of AI Governance Tools.
National IDs Around the World — Interactive map

About this Data Visualization: This interactive map displays the presence...