WPF joins OECD Expert Group on Cross-Border Cooperation

The World Privacy Forum has been selected as a civil society delegate for the OECD Expert Group that will be revising the Recommendation on Cross-Border Enforcement of Laws Protecting Privacy. WPF is a delegate on behalf of CSISAC (CSISAC is the formal Civil society stakeholder group at OECD).

The original OECD Recommendation was published and ratified in 2007, and is available here: https://www.oecd.org/digital/ieconomy/oecdrecommendationoncross-borderco-operationintheenforcementoflawsprotectingprivacy.htm

The Expert Group meetings are closed, however, WPF will provide notice of the meetings and as the relevant OECD classified material is made public, WPF will post it in our Cross-Border category. The first meeting of the Expert Group occurred on 7 June, 2022.

Details:

OECD 1st Expert Group meeting on the 2007 Recommendation of the Council on Cross – Border Cooperation in the Enforcement of Laws Protecting Privacy

7 June 2022

2-3:30 pm, CET

Virtual

Posted June 7, 2022 in Cross-Border, News, Press, and Media, OECD

Global Visualization of Countries with Data Privacy Laws, Treaties, or Conventions

Background and Methodology: The conceptualization and initial research for this...
New Report: Risky Analysis: Assessing and Improving AI Governance Tools

We are pleased to announce the publication of a new WPF report, “Risky Analysis: Assessing and Improving AI Governance Tools.” This report sets out a definition of AI governance tools, documents why and how these tools are critically important for trustworthy AI, and where these tools are around the world. The report also documents problems in some AI governance tools themselves, and suggests pathways to improve AI governance tools and create an evaluative environment to measure their effectiveness. AI systems should not be deployed without simultaneously evaluating the potential adverse impacts of such systems and mitigating their risks, and most of the world agrees about the need to take precautions against the threats posed. The specific tools and techniques that exist to evaluate and measure AI systems for their inclusiveness, fairness, explainability, privacy, safety and other trustworthiness issues — called in the report collectively AI governance tools – can improve such issues. While some AI governance tools provide reassurance to the public and to regulators, the tools too often lack meaningful oversight and quality assessments. Incomplete or ineffective AI governance tools can create a false sense of confidence, cause unintended problems, and generally undermine the promise of AI systems. The report contains rich background details, use cases, potential solutions to the problems discussed in the report, and a global index of AI Governance Tools.
National IDs Around the World — Interactive map

About this Data Visualization: This interactive map displays the presence...