WPF News: Scoring of America report in NYT, White House report

We are delighted that our 2014 report, The Scoring of America, was discussed in the New York Times over the weekend. The Scoring of America was the first major report to discuss, analyze, and rigorously document the secret scores that determine many key aspects of Americans’ financial, educational, health, and work lives and opportunities. We coined the term “consumer scores” to describe the issue.

The Scoring of America has already been cited in numerous publications, including many press outlets and the White House Big Data report. This fall, Scoring was chosen by the Future of Privacy Forum to be included in its FPF Privacy Papers 2014. The event to honor the authors of chosen papers will occur in early 2015.

Resources:

The Scoring of America: How secret consumer scores threaten your privacy and your future , World Privacy Forum, Pam Dixon and Robert Gellman.

Big Data, Seizing Opportunities, Preserving Values, Executive Office of the President of the United States (White House Big Data Report).

WPF in the news for more discussion of Scoring of America.

Posted December 29, 2014 in Modern privacy, News, Press, and Media, Report: The Scoring of America, Statistical Parity

Global Visualization of Countries with Data Privacy Laws, Treaties, or Conventions

Background and Methodology: The conceptualization and initial research for this...
New Report: Risky Analysis: Assessing and Improving AI Governance Tools

We are pleased to announce the publication of a new WPF report, “Risky Analysis: Assessing and Improving AI Governance Tools.” This report sets out a definition of AI governance tools, documents why and how these tools are critically important for trustworthy AI, and where these tools are around the world. The report also documents problems in some AI governance tools themselves, and suggests pathways to improve AI governance tools and create an evaluative environment to measure their effectiveness. AI systems should not be deployed without simultaneously evaluating the potential adverse impacts of such systems and mitigating their risks, and most of the world agrees about the need to take precautions against the threats posed. The specific tools and techniques that exist to evaluate and measure AI systems for their inclusiveness, fairness, explainability, privacy, safety and other trustworthiness issues — called in the report collectively AI governance tools – can improve such issues. While some AI governance tools provide reassurance to the public and to regulators, the tools too often lack meaningful oversight and quality assessments. Incomplete or ineffective AI governance tools can create a false sense of confidence, cause unintended problems, and generally undermine the promise of AI systems. The report contains rich background details, use cases, potential solutions to the problems discussed in the report, and a global index of AI Governance Tools.
National IDs Around the World — Interactive map

About this Data Visualization: This interactive map displays the presence...